• 2023
• Jan
• 30

COVID-19: A Pandemic of Medical Malfeasance

Monday January 30, 2023

By Scott D. G. Ventureyra

The COVID-19 crisis has functioned as a Trojan horse for advancing the agenda of the New World Order (a one-world governance). As time passes, the suspicion continues to grow that there was little, if any, justification for the draconian measures taken throughout the world to “curb the spread” of COVID-19. Governments, health organizations, big pharma, big tech, and the legacy media all seemingly acted in lockstep to exponentially advance the World Economic Forum’s infamous Great Reset. Klaus Schwab and co-author Thierrey Malleret make clear in the conclusion of their book, COVID-19: The Great Reset, that the pandemic “represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine and reset our world.” I argue in my recent book, COVID-19: A Dystopian Delusion, that all of these draconian and unscientific measures such as lockdowns, mask mandates, vaccine mandates, the unrelenting assault on informed consent, the rollout of experimental vaccines, the mainstream media’s mass fear mongering campaign, and the censorship, punishment and character assassination of effective dissenting voices, were all done to relinquish our rights under the guise of public health. The truth is that none of this was ever about our health; if it were, we would have seen transparency, effective government policy, and decision-making that was focused on our wellbeing. Indeed, many of these “remedies” have been more harmful than the disease of COVID-19.

Ensuring the Compliance of Heath Practitioners

In Canada, physicians, surgeons, and nurses have been admonished not to stray from the medical “consensus” regarding COVID-19. At the end of April 2021, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) issued a statement threatening those who question and contradict the holy grail of COVID-19. The position taken by the CPSO is nothing short of tyrannical. The fact that they are reprimanding doctors for questioning any of the holy tenets of the COVID-19 “pandemic,” such as the safety of the COVID vaccines, masks, “social” distancing (a self-contradictory term), the efficacy of lockdowns, and suppressing knowledge of treatments that can show how unnecessary the vaccine is, is truly reprehensible. This is and has always been an unscientific approach that is motivated by politics rather than evidence. If medical professionals are betraying their conscience and administering medical treatments that they know are harmful, then they are willfully participating in medical malfeasance. It is a flagrant assault on health practitioners’ freedom of speech and conscience, to not be able to oppose this. It is also an utter violation of the first principle of non-maleficence born out of the Hippocratic Oath, i.e., to never do harm. The upholding of the Hippocratic Oath when it comes to its substance, such as the principle of non-maleficence, i.e., to never do harm, corresponds to unchanging truth and goodness that are not susceptible to cultural change and moral relativism.

Throughout the world, doctors who have questioned the preposterous COVID narrative have been subject to punitive measures, including suspensions from colleges, loss of certifications, censorship, slander, and even death threats. I’ll give a few examples of doctors, all of whom supported the Truckers’ Freedom Convoy (all are Canadian except one), who have endured ruthless attacks by the COVID regime. First, in June 2021, Francis Christian, a Clinical Professor of Surgery at the University of Saskatchewan in Canada, was suspended from his academic and professorial duties as Director of the Surgical Humanities Program and his role as Director of Quality and Patient Safety for raising concerns about informed consent and safety for vaccinating children. Second, emergency medicine doctor Patrick Phillips, who successfully treated patients with ivermectin, was suspended in May 2022 for allegations of misconduct by the corrupt College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. Third, pathologist and medical doctor Roger Hodkinson, who was a staunch supporter of the Freedom Convoy, had his credentials questioned by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (interestingly, the claim is no longer listed on their website). Finally, Peter McCullough, who is an American internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist, and the Chief Scientific Officer of The Wellness Company and one of the most published cardiologists in the history of medicine, was stripped of his medical certifications.

Such violations of our rights and freedoms have set the stage for the disintegration of the patient-physician relationship. One of the most egregious aspects of the COVID-19 crisis has been the suppression and demonization of effective and inexpensive early COVID-19 treatments. In an impassioned speech on January 30, 2022, Dr. Chris Shoemaker emphatically stated:

The most dangerous mandate was not the mandate of the last 6 months; the most dangerous mandate was the mandate of 18 months ago. The mandate from 18 months ago, that prevented me - a doctor - from giving a safe normal couple of medications that would reduce someone’s infection time from 14 days down to three or four. And you know what if you can keep it down to days three and four instead of 14, they don’t get to day 14 because we all know what happens after that day 14 and beyond. You’re in the I. C. U. And that’s it. So, therapeutics could have been in place. Should have been in place but it doesn’t stop it from starting now. You can write the Canadian Medical Association you can write the colleges of all the doctors in Canada. You can write the Canadian Pharmacy Association which has cooperated with the other agencies to prevent doctors. I only wanted to do one thing a year and a half ago: I wanted to cure a few patients. I wanted to save a few patients and the medical agencies prevented it. God bless you.

Filmed by Jay Bee on January 30, 2022. Click here to see more…

And still to this day, doctors in Canada are not allowed to prescribe ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine. Undoubtedly, the effectiveness and inexpensiveness of early COVID-19 treatments were seen as a huge threat to the medical-industrial complex, which implicates a network of corrupt interactions between governments, pharmaceutical corporations, medical doctors, health care personnel, and medical conglomerates.

The Demonization of Early COVID-19 Treatments

As Dr. Shoemaker above alluded to, effective COVID-19 treatments that could have saved thousands upon thousands of lives were demonized from the onset of the crisis; antiviral treatments such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin that have been proven to be effective for the treatment of COVID-19 were either discredited or banned. However, remdesivir was highly used and promoted by Dr. Anthony Fauci and many governments, including those in Canada. Due to the toxicity of remdesivir, it may have very well contributed to a significant number of adverse effects and deaths in hospitalized patients who received the drug, but, as usual, deaths were accredited to COVID-19. Hospitals have been incentivized by governments to use remdesivir.

Hydroxychloroquine

In March and April of 2020, the mainstream media unjustly blasted President Trump for promoting the use of hydroxychloroquine as an early treatment for COVID-19. During that period, several articles were published arguing that it led to the deaths of a number of hospitalized patients. In June of 2020, an article published in the journal Clinical Advances argued that there are no benefits to treating COVID-19 through the use of hydroxychloroquine and that it has contributed to the increasing number of deaths. Nevertheless, hydroxychloroquine combined with azithromycin is a relatively inexpensive treatment that has been endorsed by a prominent French scientist, Didier Raoult, who is one of the most highly cited microbiologists in the world. He and his colleagues published a couple of studies that showed that it was efficacious in the early treatment of COVID-19. Thus, despite claims to the contrary, if administered early on during the period when the first clinical signs of the flu are detected, then the success rate can be quite high. Moreover, at the onset of the pandemic, the late medical doctor Vladimir Zelenko treated over 1,450 patients who tested positive for COVID-19 with 200 mg of hydroxychloroquine twice a day for 5 days, 500 mg of azithromycin once a day for 5 days, and 220 mg of zinc sulfate (an ingredient often ignored by studies that are critical of the treatment) once a day for 5 days, producing a 99.9% success rate (only 2 deaths). In order to ensure success, hydroxychloroquine must be taken in conjunction with the other two drugs (or at least zinc). Medical doctor Anthony Cardill, in Los Angeles, observed that many patients become symptom-free after 8–12 hours of taking these drugs.

The studies involving hydroxychloroquine (alongside azithromycin and zinc) as a treatment for COVID-19 involve three different stages: prophylactic, early symptomatic stages, and late-stage treatments. Most of the studies that were eventually retracted focused on the late-stage treatment, but this was more misleading than anything since researchers ought to have known that the treatment wouldn’t have a positive effect based on prior knowledge. It is at the prophylactic stage and predominantly in the early symptomatic stage where the treatment will make its greatest impact. Proper dosages must be taken to ensure successful treatment. The abovementioned studies that argue against the usage of hydroxychloroquine do not address the true efficacy of the treatment but, rather, provide a misleading analysis. On June 4, 2020, there was an enormous retraction from The Lancet, one of the most respected and established medical journals in the world. This retraction was considered to be one of the largest in modern medical journal history. The claim of the paper was that hydroxychloroquine increases arrhythmias and decreases hospital survival rates, but in the end, the evidence could not support such claims.

This leaves the door open to the independent work, claims, and results of scientists and medical doctors such as Dr. Didier Raoult, who has been cited over 150, 000 times according to Google Scholar, Dr. Zelenko, and others, regarding the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19’s treatment. Interestingly, an hour after The Lancet journal’s retraction, The New England Journal of Medicine retracted a separate study involving blood pressure medications in COVID-19 which had used data and was supported by the William Harvey Distinguished Chair in Advanced Cardiovascular Medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, as was The Lancet article. An unprecedented number of 205 articles related to COVID-19 have been withdrawn since March 2020. The organization Retraction Watch monitors the retractions of papers from peer-reviewed journals worldwide.

Even CNN admitted that hydroxychloroquine was effective in helping hospitalized COVID-19 patients survive—going against their prior false narrative. CNN calls it “surprising” and “controversial.” This is only the case because Big Pharma had other plans by lying, censoring, and smearing any favourable studies and information regarding the lifesaving drug. A final point worth mentioning is that the hydroxychloroquine is a highly inexpensive treatment so the incentive to make monetary gain is just not there.

Ivermectin

The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was awarded to Tu Youyou, William C. Campbell, and Satoshi Omura in 2015 for the discovery of ivermectin. It was the committee’s first award for an antiviral disease treatment since streptomycin in 1952. Throughout 2020, the Frontline Covid Care Alliance (FLCC) conducted a comprehensive review of the effectiveness of ivermectin in the prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19. The abstract was removed without notice from Frontiers in Pharmacology. The authors summarized their findings as follows:

[B]ased on the existing and cumulative body of evidence, we recommend the use of ivermectin in both prophylaxis and treatment for COVID-19. In the presence of a global COVID-19 surge, the widespread use of this safe, inexpensive, and effective intervention would lead to a drastic reduction in transmission rates and the morbidity and mortality in mild, moderate, and even severe disease phases. The authors are encouraged and hopeful at the prospect of the many favorable public health and societal impacts that would result once these practices were adopted.

Furthermore, in March 2021, Omura and his team performed a wide review of the clinical activity involved in combating COVID-19. Their study concluded that ivermectin aided in large reductions in mortality and morbidity. Most recently, Peter McCullough and his colleagues, with the consideration of a few new studies, corroborated the findings of Omura and team. Despite good medical and scientific evidence of the drug’s efficaciousness, Canada has not authorized it to prevent or treat COVID-19. Health Canada issued a misleading warning regarding the use of ivermectin. Through providing misleading statements, Health Canada is ignoring the corroborating evidence that the antiviral drug is extremely effective at treating people with COVID-19. Similarly, in an effort to discredit not only ivermectin but also Joe Rogan (for promoting it), mainstream media outlets like CNN, NBC, MSNBC, and others claimed that Joe Rogan took horse de-wormer medication; this is how they framed ivermectin. This should come as no surprise since they all want to push the vaccine on all citizens. CNN’s Chief Medical Correspondent, Sanjay Gupta, did not know how to respond to Rogan on his podcast when confronted as to why CNN would push a blatant lie like this.

Kickin’ the Darkness Until it Bleeds Daylight

The COVID-19 crisis, if anything, exposed the deep corruption of our governments, the media, and medical institutions. More recently, Alberta oncologist William Makis has written two unanswered letters to the Canadian Medical Association, imploring them to investigate the sudden deaths of close to 100 medical doctors since the vaccine rollout. The silence he has been met with is deafening. He has also exposed the deep corruption within the Alberta College of Physicians and its connection to the law. Medical doctors and medical institutions that have betrayed the principle of non-maleficence have engaged in a true Faustian bargain. They should take heed of Jesus’ words: “What does it profit a man to gain the world and lose his soul?” (Matthew 16:26)

The whole COVID fiasco has been an extreme violation of rights and freedoms, facilitated by governments, big pharma, big tech, the media, and medical institutions, who have all participated in countless crimes against humanity. It has also been an affront to reason. Eventually, it is my hope that all the culprits will be held accountable and brought to justice without amnesty. The Freedom Convoy gave so much hope to so many people. The truckers were our last line of defense. The truckers and the freedom convoy are what made me proud to be Canadian again. Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò beautifully summarizes the profound impact of the truckers which has reverberated across the world and inspired similar movements, including Dutch farmers’ own freedom convoy:

In these days, we see the masks of tyrants from all over the world fall and, unfortunately, we also see so much conformism, so much fearfulness, so much cowardice in people who, up until yesterday, we regarded as friends, even among our family members. Yet, precisely because of this extreme situation, we discover with amazement gestures of humanity made by strangers, signs of solidarity and brotherhood on the part of those who feel close to us in the common battle. We discover so much generosity and so much desire to shake us from this stupor. We discover that we are no longer willing to passively suffer the destruction of our world — imposed by a cabal of unscrupulous criminals thirsty for power and money… Today, more than ever, it is essential that you realize that it is no longer possible to passively assist. It is necessary to take a position, to fight for freedom, to demand respect for natural freedoms. But, even more, dear Canadian brothers, it is necessary to understand that this dystopia serves to establish the dictatorship of the New World Order and totally erase every trace of Our Lord Jesus Christ from society, from history and from the traditions of peoples.

I co-wrote and edited the book COVID-19: A Dystopian Delusion to bear historical witness to the truth and to leave a record behind of who was who in all of this. I dedicated it to the Canadian truckers and all the freedom fighters across Canada and the world because of the inspiration they have brought to the world. I’ll now close with the words of epidemiologist Dr. Paul Alexander, who was a prominent presence at the Truckers’ Freedom Convoy:

The truckers have the science on their side, and the government does not, but the government will not even move to negotiate a reasonable peaceful solution; why?… The truckers have won, for the government, Trudeau never negotiated with them and had to resort to brute force to move them and get them out… no negotiation, just brute force, so in effect, the government has lost fully.

Scott D. G. Ventureyra (PhD, Carleton University in Ottawa) is the editor and author of several books, including On the Origin of Consciousness, COVID-19: A Dystopian Delusion, Making Sense of Nonsense and most recently Beacons of Hope (a satirical-gag book poking fun at Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland). He founded True Freedom Press in October 2020. He has written for several academic journals, magazines, and newspapers. He has presented his research at conferences around North America, including the Science of Consciousness in Tucson, Arizona. Here is an interview he gave with RAIR Foundation USA. His website www.scottventureyra.com is undergoing major reconstruction and will be up and running soon.